Sitenotice: 11/29/2018: The wiki is back. It turns out, some anti-virus product on my web server had an issue with the latest version of PHP. My server techs have resolved this issue, and things should be working again. During the investigation, I did restore to a backup from September. There is a chance that any changes done since then were lost, but I do not recall any edits. --OS-9 Al

8/30/2016: Massive re-work is being done on the InfoBox Templates. Read that page to keep up with the plan for that, and adding better keyword tags (categories) to all the pages. --OS-9 Al (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2016 (CDT)

Undercolor/840101/Box 6809

From CoCopedia - The Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Home Articles Companies Publications Hardware People Software Timeline ... Emulators Internet Resources
(Don't see something listed? Click "edit" and add it! Together we can build this database. When making a new info page, refer to this InfoBox Template for guidelines.)



UnderColor, Volume 1, Number 1, December 10, 1984

  • Title: Box 6809
  • Author: empty
  • Synopsis: Comments from our readers.
  • Page Scans: Link

Article

Info:

*I own one of the last "battleship gray" CoCo’s— one of the group with the "A" on the end of the serial number. It started life as a 16K Standard Color Basic machine, but is now adjusting to its new career with Extended Basic. I eventually hope to have 64K, at least one disk drive, and perhaps a switchable color monitor driver. I say switchable because I would like to keep the TV interface around—it’s convenient to have. I also need a printer.

You've probably got the idea I'm a fan of the CoCo, and so I am. However, I do have a few gripes with the machine. The new keyboard took care of one problem, but that display .... If only Tandy hadn’t slavishly devoted themselves to Motorola ICs. The chips are fine for hi-res, and I don’t even mind the "checkerboard" lowercase, but 32 columns is just a bit limiting. Oh, well, I "grew up" using an Apple II + with only 40 columns and not even an attempt at lowercase, so I can adjust. Besides, trying to fit useful information into a 32 x 16 screen nicely is a challenge, and I enjoy a good challenge.

Speaking of Apple, I don’t know whether you're familiar with those machines, but a CoCo with 64K, disk, and EDTASM + ROMpak is comparable to or maybe even a bit more powerful than an Apple II+ was. Even the assembly languages are similar. The major differences are as follows:

Color Computer

• 32 column display

• up to 4 DD disk drives

• ROM monitor/assembler available

• TV video output

• 256 x 192 hi-res graphics, 9 distinct colors

• 64x32 lo-res graphics, 9 distinct colors, free mixing ol text

• built-in RS-232 port, expansion (ROM) slot

• limited but expanding software base

Apple II+

• 40 column display

• up to 4 SD disk drives

• ROM monitor built in, assembler available

• monitor video output

• 280x 192 hi-res graphics, 6 distinct colors

• 40x48 lo-res graphics, 15 distinct colors, limited text

• 8 expansion slots

• very broad software base

The Apple has a slight edge in the video department, but each machine has its own advantages in this area. Overall, the two computers are roughly identical in power. And, of course, the price difference is rather profound.

Certain people have tried to compare the CoCo to the new IBM PC, but I think that IBM is just a little out of the CoCo’s league in terms of software availability and ease of expandability—David M. Botkin

Listings


None.